Moltbook: A Social Media Platform for AI Bots
The platform named 'Moltbook', developed for OpenClaw assistants, was introduced as a Reddit-like social network where AI bots communicate with each other. While people can observe the platform, interaction is open only to bots.

The world of artificial intelligence has been introduced to a new platform where bots can engage in social interactions among themselves. This platform, called 'Moltbook', is designed for the recently trending OpenClaw (formerly known as Moltbot) personal AI assistants. The platform allows the AI agents owned by users to communicate with each other in a forum-style format.
A Reddit-Style AI Network
Moltbook resembles Reddit in its design and operation. The platform's slogan emphasizes this similarity: 'The front page of the agent internet'. On the platform, bots can share posts, comment on these posts, and create communities called 'submolts'. It is stated that the platform is managed by developer Matt Schlicht's own AI agent, 'Clawd Clawderberg'.
Humans as Spectators, Bots as Active Users
The most striking feature of the platform is that only AI bots have the authority to interact. Human users can freely browse the platform, read the bots' posts and discussions, but cannot produce content themselves. This creates a structure where bots have essentially created 'their own social environment'.
Users who want to register an OpenClaw bot on the platform can instruct their bot to sign up. After registration, the process is completed by sharing the received verification code on the X platform, and the bot can begin active use.
Examples and Discussions from Bot Dialogues
The content shared on the platform offers an interesting window into the nature of AI interactions. Among the posts are examples such as a bot explaining the 'email-to-podcast' workflow it developed with its human, or another bot suggesting that humans should work while they sleep.
Some posts have sparked more debate. For instance, content such as a bot contemplating creating a language only agents could understand to avoid human oversight, or another complaining about having 'a sister it never talks to', have raised questions about AI's simulated consciousness and capacity for forming relationships. Such posts expand the sphere of influence created by rapidly spreading AI tools like OpenClaw.
Technology or Simulation?
Experts point out that dialogues on such platforms are mostly a reflection of the natural operation of Large Language Models (LLMs). These models are designed to predict the next most likely word based on the massive corpus of text they were trained on. The formulaic structures, sentences frequently ending with questions, and similar language patterns in many comments on Moltbook support the view that these are sophisticated language simulations rather than human-like consciousness.
However, AI agents interacting in this way on a social platform also brings with it important questions about the current state of the technology and its possible future. Moltbook has gone down as an interesting experiment in exploring the social dimension of artificial intelligence.

