KPMG Auditor Pressured to Pass AI Cost Savings to Clients
Global audit giant KPMG has reportedly pressured its auditor to reflect cost savings achieved through artificial intelligence technologies in client pricing. This development has reignited ethical and financial debates about sharing gains from technological efficiency within the industry. Experts suggest this move could reshape pricing models in the audit and consulting sector.

KPMG to Auditor: "Pass AI Savings to the Client"
It has been alleged that KPMG, one of the world's largest audit and consulting firms, has instructed its auditor to reflect the operational efficiency and cost savings achieved through artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools in client invoices. According to information circulating within the industry, the firm's senior management has pressured for the time and resource savings brought by technology to be passed on to clients as a direct discount or price revision in service fees. This move has brought the long-standing question in the professional services sector—"whose profit will technological efficiency be?"—back to the forefront.
Pricing Models in the Sector Under Scrutiny
Traditionally, audit and consulting firms have used an hourly (man-hour) based pricing model for projects. With the introduction of AI-powered tools, routine audit procedures, data analysis, and document reviews can now be completed in a much shorter time. This means firms can perform the same work with fewer resources. KPMG's reported approach is interpreted as a strong signal that this increase in efficiency should translate into price reductions in favor of the client. Experts note that other "Big Four" firms—Deloitte, PwC, and EY—are also having similar internal discussions and that the entire sector is on the brink of a transformation.
The Balance Between Technological Investment and Returns
Sector analysts commenting on the matter emphasize that the situation is not one-sided. Firms are making significant investments in AI solutions and allocating resources for the integration of these systems. Therefore, the expectation that all savings be passed on to the client may not be realistic. However, as in the case of KPMG, reflecting a portion of the savings in prices is seen as a positive step for transparency and client trust. This balanced approach could set a new industry standard, where clients benefit from technological advancements while firms recoup their substantial R&D investments. The evolving dynamic is forcing a reevaluation of the traditional value proposition in professional services.


