GPT-4o Revived on InfiniaxAI for $5 Amid User Outcry Over OpenAI Restrictions

GPT-4o Revived on InfiniaxAI for $5 Amid User Outcry Over OpenAI Restrictions

As users across Reddit, Twitter, and AI forums expressed dismay over OpenAI’s apparent restriction of GPT-4o access for non-subscribers, an unexpected lifeline emerged from an obscure platform: InfiniaxAI. According to a post on r/OpenAI by user /u/Substantial_Ear_1131, the service has reinstated GPT-4o at a flat rate of $5 per month—just one-quarter the cost of ChatGPT Plus—offering users near-unlimited usage alongside a suite of advanced AI tools.

The move comes as OpenAI continues to tighten access to its most capable models, shifting toward a subscription-based monetization strategy. While ChatGPT Plus subscribers pay $20 monthly for GPT-4o access, InfiniaxAI’s offering provides an alternative that appeals to students, developers, and hobbyists who feel priced out of premium AI capabilities. The platform also grants access to other cutting-edge models, including what it claims to be ‘Claude 4.6 Opus’ and ‘GPT 5.2 Pro,’ though neither model has been officially released by Anthropic or OpenAI as of this reporting.

According to the Reddit post, InfiniaxAI is not merely a model host—it positions itself as a full-stack AI development environment. Users can build web applications, deploy custom AI architectures, and integrate multiple models into workflows without needing advanced coding skills. A linked YouTube demo showcases features such as drag-and-drop interface builders, real-time model switching, and API connectivity tools, suggesting a platform designed to compete with established tools like Hugging Face and Replicate.

While the initiative has been met with enthusiastic support from thousands of commenters on Reddit, questions remain about the legitimacy and legality of the service. OpenAI has not publicly acknowledged InfiniaxAI’s use of GPT-4o, and there is no evidence the company has licensed its model to the platform. The use of unlicensed, potentially reverse-engineered or leaked weights could violate OpenAI’s terms of service and intellectual property rights. Experts warn that such services, while popular, may face legal action or sudden shutdowns without warning.

Meanwhile, the rise of InfiniaxAI reflects a broader trend in the AI ecosystem: the growing demand for affordable, open-access models. With companies like Meta releasing open-weight models (e.g., Llama 3) and Hugging Face democratizing access to thousands of AI systems, users are increasingly rejecting paywalls on powerful technology. InfiniaxAI’s success, even if temporary, underscores a cultural shift—many users believe foundational AI models should be accessible, not locked behind corporate subscriptions.

However, caution is advised. The platform’s references to ‘GPT 5.2 Pro’ and ‘Claude 4.6 Opus’ appear to be speculative or fabricated, as no such versions exist in public or private releases from either OpenAI or Anthropic. This raises concerns about transparency and potential misinformation. Users are urged to verify model claims independently and avoid submitting sensitive data to unverified third-party services.

As the AI arms race intensifies, platforms like InfiniaxAI may represent the vanguard of a decentralized AI future—or the last gasp of an unsustainable model-hoarding ecosystem. For now, thousands are logging in, testing, and building—proving that demand for accessible AI outpaces corporate policy. Whether this sparks regulatory intervention, legal challenges, or inspires OpenAI to reconsider its pricing remains to be seen.

For more information, visit infiniax.ai or view the platform demo at https://youtu.be/Ed-zKoKYdYM.