TR

Anthropic Bans OAuth Access for Claude in Third-Party Apps, Shaking AI Ecosystem

Anthropic has abruptly banned OAuth authentication for Claude in third-party applications, effectively ending tools like OpenClaw that relied on integrated access. Users and developers are scrambling to adapt as the move signals a broader shift toward closed AI ecosystems.

calendar_today🇹🇷Türkçe versiyonu
Anthropic Bans OAuth Access for Claude in Third-Party Apps, Shaking AI Ecosystem

Anthropic Bans OAuth Access for Claude in Third-Party Apps, Shaking AI Ecosystem

In a move that has sent ripples through the developer and automation communities, Anthropic has officially banned OAuth authentication for its Claude large language models in third-party applications. The policy change, confirmed by company documentation and widely reported by industry observers, has rendered popular tools like OpenClaw—once a staple for AI-powered workflow automation—nonfunctional overnight. According to Wes Roth’s coverage on Natural20, the ban targets any external app attempting to authenticate users via OAuth tokens tied to Claude subscriptions, effectively cutting off seamless integration between Claude and third-party platforms.

One of the most vocal affected parties is Phil, a productivity automation specialist who detailed his experience on Medium. In a post titled "Anthropic Just Killed My $200/Month OpenClaw Setup. So I Rebuilt It for $15," Phil describes how OpenClaw, a tool he used to automate email responses, data aggregation, and calendar scheduling via Claude’s API, became unusable within hours of the policy update. "I built my entire digital workflow around this," Phil wrote. "I paid $200 a month for Claude Pro to access this integration. Now, it’s gone. No warning. No grace period. Just a silent API block."

Anthropic’s decision, as reported by WinBuzzer, appears to be part of a broader strategy to tighten control over its model’s usage and monetization. The company reportedly cited "security concerns" and "brand integrity" as primary motivations, warning that third-party OAuth integrations could expose user credentials and dilute the user experience. While the company has not issued a formal press release, internal developer communications obtained by multiple sources indicate that Anthropic is prioritizing direct user engagement through its own web and mobile interfaces, discouraging indirect monetization by external developers.

The fallout has been swift. Online forums, Reddit threads, and developer Slack groups are flooded with users seeking alternatives. Some have turned to self-hosted open-source models, while others have rebuilt their automation stacks using Anthropic’s newly restricted official API with manual token handling—albeit at a fraction of the convenience. Phil’s $15 rebuild, for instance, now relies on a combination of Zapier’s native Claude integration and custom Python scripts that bypass OAuth entirely by using API keys stored locally.

This shift mirrors a growing trend among major AI firms. OpenAI, Google, and now Anthropic are increasingly moving away from open ecosystem models toward walled-garden approaches, limiting third-party innovation in favor of controlled revenue streams. Critics argue this stifles the innovation that once defined the AI boom, while proponents claim it ensures safety, compliance, and sustainable business models.

For now, the future of AI automation hinges on whether developers can adapt to these new constraints—or whether regulatory bodies will intervene to preserve interoperability. As Phil put it: "They didn’t just kill a tool. They killed the idea that AI should be open, plug-and-play, and truly user-owned."

Anthropic has not responded to requests for comment as of press time.

AI-Powered Content

recommendRelated Articles